- By Veronik on September 17, 2012
Quick post: my daughter Oona is participating in the Terry Fox Run this year. In order to help her raise her objective, I’m running a contest – anyone who donates anything over $5 will be entered in a draw for a sweater’s worth of St-Denis Sommet (15 balls!) in the colour of the winner’s choice. Second prize will consist of a kit to knit this little
Terryteddy bear as well as the magazine containing the pattern. Here is Oona’s page:
Thank you and good luck!
ETA: don’t forget to send me an email or to leave a comment if you donate – I know how to reach a couple of the donors so far, but not all. And I certainly don’t know how to reach ‘anonynous’!
- By Veronik on September 5, 2012
Several snippets of news today – and well there should be, after so many months of silence…
Some time ago, I began to reconsider having a yarn line; for a variety of reasons, it was decided that it was time to let it go. So, as of today, the process of liquidating the yarn in stock has begun. Everything but the magazines, patterns and Briggs & Little yarn is 30% off the original price – the magazines are 50% off. Please note that all orders will ship from Canada, that supplies are limited and that sale prices cannot be applied retroactively. So, stock up!
In other news, I should add that the title of this post is not an analogy and that I am indeed back in school full time. Earlier this year, I enrolled in beauty school with the goal of becoming a hairdresser. Everything is working out great on that front, and I have been immersed in the world of hair for a little over 3 months. It’s about to get even more exciting later this month as we begin to learn the craft of hair colour…
With these announcements, some of you may wonder what lies next for me within the knitting world – I’ve wondered about this myself. However, a friend (pictured above – recognize him?) asked if I would be interested in joining his in house knitwear design team. Our first collection is finally unveiled this morning, which means I no longer have to keep it a secret. You can see the look book here…
- By Veronik on April 20, 2012
[qt:http://stdenisyarns.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Pfaff-262-sml-2.m4v 535 400]
After I took the vintage machine for their little airing, my friend remarked positively on the Pfaff. That little compliment along with having sewn curtains for Monique a few weeks ago did it – it was high time to get old 262 going again.
(in case you’re wondering: sewing curtains on the other machines is fine, but it feels like I’m pushing it too hard when I sew at maximum speed for a certain length of time. The Pfaff 238 must have spoiled me, as it was such a beast. The 262 isn’t as strong, but still has a 1.12 amp motor which will fare better with curtains and denim than the Janome’s 0.7 amp motor.)
Anyhow, try as I might, the 262 does not want to be reasoned with – it only wants to do a zigzag. Since opening her up, I’ve joined a couple of groups of vintage sewing machine enthusiasts and created the video above so that they could weigh in as to what the problem might be (bigger video can be found here).
I apologize to those of you who have no interest in sewing and/or vintage machines – I’ll be back on track soon. In any case, all my knitting is secret at the moment so I wouldn’t have anything to tell you about even if I wasn’t so enthralled with gears.
- By Veronik on March 28, 2012
A good friend interested in sewing sweetly asked for a post on my sewing machines – probably out of surprise that I own so many. Truthfully, I used to own more – my first three sewing machines are no longer around. The first – A singer purchased from Consumers Distributing (Canadians will get a chuckle out of that one) died after sewing a few too many buttonholes for a Gilbert and Sullivan production of ‘The Gondoliers’. The second, another Singer but a much older model purchased from the Salvation Army for $20 proved superfluous when I graduated to an industrial sewing machine capable of working a zig zag stitch. It was a great machine, but huge – it made no sense to hang on to it when I stopped sewing for hire.
This is what’s left – let me begin with the oldest…
The Singer 221 (also known as a Singer Featherweight) looks older than it really is. It was given to me by my father in law and used to belong to his mother. Judging from the serial number, she must have purchased it either in the late 50s or the early 60s from ‘Chalifour’ on St-Hubert in Montreal:
It can only do a straight stitch on its own (a zigzagger attachment was available for it), but it is famous for the beauty of its stitch and is prized among quilters. I have fabric on hand to make Marcel a couple of shirts – with this machine and my copy of ‘Shirtmaking’ by David Page Coffin, I’ll be all set. Marcel will love wearing shirts made on his grandmother’s machine.
My grandmother’s sewing machine, a Pfaff 262, is only a little older – I believe she purchased it in the mid 60s. She was a dressmaker and used hers quite a bit more than Nanny did hers, as you can see! Many machines of this era utilized removable stitch cams in order to work decorative stitches – the attachment I mentioned earlier for the featherweight used these to work stitches beyond the zigzag stitch. The Pfaff was different in that its cams were built in – one refers to a ‘stitch wheel’ in order to access these stitches.
It’s classified as a ‘light industrial’ and weighs a ton. Unfortunately, it needs to be serviced – I think the timing is off. When I get a minute, I’ll attempt to clean and adjust it.
The serger was another gift and dates back to 1996. It’s a basic machine but can accomplish all I need it to do: it has differential feed, an adjustable cutting width, either 3 or 4 overlock stitch and can work a rolled hem. Parts are still available and it’s easy to work with , so what’s not to love?
A couple years later in 1998, after much saving, I acquired my first ‘fancy’ machine – a Janome 4800. I love this machine - buttonholes used to take forever before I had it. I worked them manually using a zigzag stitch and a lot of marking was necessary. Fine when sewing something precious, but irritating when sewing pajama tops. No longer – the Janome works identical buttonholes one after the other.
As you’d expect from such a machine, it boasts a fair number of built in stitches, but not too many crazy ones. I mostly like the fact that its straight stitch and buttonholes are very nice. The keyhole buttonhole and eyelet are nice extras, and it’s fun to monogram the yoke of a shirt with the alphabet. The stitches can be combined as well as lengthened without affecting the stitch density. The adjustable speed is useful to new sewers – Oona likes that she can slow it down so that it doesn’t take off on her. I love the needle up/down feature.
The newest member of the family is the coverstitch machine – this is the type of machine used to hem tee shirts. It sews a double or triple line of top stitching on one side and an overlock on the reverse side. A similar look can be achieved with a twin needle on a sewing machine but tunneling is often a problem (tunneling refers to a raised effect between the two rows of stitching) and the reverse side isn’t very attractive (IMO). Before purchasing it, I also considered two Janome models – one was similarly priced but could only sew a double line of top stitching which meant being limited to a 6mm wide cover stitch while the brother can sew either a 3mm wide or 6mm wide coverstitch. The more expensive model from Janome had this option as well as a free arm, but I couldn’t justify the extra expense.
Some sergers can work a coverstitch as well. From what I’ve heard, the serger to coverstitch conversion takes a while. Since I’m sentimental about my serger and I have the room for an extra machine, it disn’t make sense to replace it. But the option is available.
I’ll now ask you for help: my friend already has a sewing machine but is thinking about a serger as he would like to work with jerseys. Do you have any recommendations? Do you own a combination serger/coverstitch? And do you know of other books besides Mr Coffin’s you’d recommend to a guy? Somehow, I don’t imagine he’ll want to hear all about using a serger to produce lettuce edges…
- By Veronik on March 22, 2012
That little top I spoke about the other day is done and I’m pretty happy with it. I’d read quite a bit about the sewing instructions on sewing blogs and pattern review, which led to to research the RTW version online. As far as I can tell, the original was constructed using a coverstitch machine and the vogue instructions attempted to achieve the same effect using twin needle stitching using a regular sewing machine. Since I happen to have a coverstitch machine, I didn’t use a twin needle for this project (never had great results with it on jersey, anyway).
I also opted against the selvedges on the outside, which I think my jersey is too heavy for. Instead, I serged the raglan seams in addition to a handful of little squares. I then tested various needle/presser foot configurations on the coverstitch on those little squares until I found a pleasing combination: 3mm wide coverstitch stitched from the wrong side using the wider topstitching foot for the brother 2340cv. Using the two left needles allowed the serged seam to center well enough so the fabric was a breeze to guide through. The back received the same treatment – both the RTW and Vogue versions call for satin ribbon on either side of a minute gap between the left and right back pieces, but I didn’t have satin ribbon on hand and, again, I think my jersey is too heavy for this kind of treatment.
I completely undid the neckband – the instructions called for it to be topstitched with the raw edges apparent but I didn’t like the look – first, I should have sewn it with the wrong/purl side out. The edges rolled in and I feel it would be more successful with the edges rolling out. It could be my fault, though – I didn’t cut the band on the true bias. I ended up simply serging the neckband and neckline together right at the cut edge – can’t imagine I took off more than 1/16″ or so. Doing so raised the neckline a tad.
The bottom hem was simply turned up 3/4″, pressed and topstitched – I didn’t trim the miter, so multiple layers are present at each point but I don’t think it’ll be a problem. The sleeve hems received the same treatment but were only turned up 1/2″.
Fit wise, it’s pretty good (sorry, too camera shy to model). Being a little shorter than 5’4″, I removed 2″ from the body (1″ at each mark) and 1″ from the sleeve. The cap and underarm section seems a little long on me, but only by a little. I’ll definitely make it again with a very lightweight black jersey.